4.7 Article

Electrospun Biomaterials from Chitosan Blends Applied as Scaffold for Tissue Regeneration

Journal

POLYMERS
Volume 13, Issue 7, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/polym13071037

Keywords

electrospinning; chondrocyte development; AFM; chitosan; hyaluronan; PEC; nanofiber

Funding

  1. Mexican CONACYT [611845/788990]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This work summarizes the main results obtained in processing pure chitosan and chitosan/hyaluronan complex for biomedical applications. It describes the preparation of nanofiber mats for tissue engineering and investigates the advantages of chitosan nanofiber mats compared to chitosan films. The study shows that chondrocyte development is benefited by chitosan nanofiber mats.
Our objective in this work was to summarize the main results obtained in processing pure chitosan and chitosan/hyaluronan complex in view of biomedical applications, taking advantage of their original properties. In addition, an electrospinning technique was selected to prepare nanofiber mats well adapted for tissue engineering in relation to the large porosity of the materials, allowing an exchange with the environment. The optimum conditions for preparation of purified and stable nanofibers in aqueous solution and phosphate buffer pH = 7.4 are described. Their mechanical properties and degree of swelling are given. Then, the prepared biomaterials are investigated to test their advantage for chondrocyte development after comparison of nanofiber mats and uniform films. For that purpose, the adhesion of cells is studied by atomic force microscopy (AFM) using single-cell force spectroscopy, showing the good adhesion of chondrocytes on chitosan. At the end, adhesion and proliferation of chondrocytes in vitro are examined and clearly show the interest of chitosan nanofiber mats compared to chitosan film for potential application in tissue engineering.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available