4.7 Article

Ex-Situ Evaluation of Commercial Polymer Membranes for Vanadium Redox Flow Batteries (VRFBs)

Journal

POLYMERS
Volume 13, Issue 6, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/polym13060926

Keywords

membrane; vanadium redox flow batteries (VRFBs); ex-situ evaluation; vanadium ion crossover; chemical stability; proton conductivity

Funding

  1. National Research Council Canada's Energy Storage (ES) Program
  2. National Research Council of Canada Industrial Research Assistance Program (NRC-IRAP)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study identified five high-priority characteristics of membranes and evaluated eight commercially available ion exchange membranes, recommending perfluorosulfonic acid membranes and hydrocarbon anion exchange membranes as candidates for further in-situ testing, while one hydrocarbon cation exchange membrane was deemed not suitable for VRFB application.
Polymer membranes play a vital role in vanadium redox flow batteries (VRFBs), acting as a separator between the two compartments, an electronic insulator for maintaining electrical neutrality of the cell, and an ionic conductor for allowing the transport of ionic charge carriers. It is a major influencer of VRFB performance, but also identified as one of the major factors limiting the large-scale implementation of VRFB technology in energy storage applications due to its cost and durability. In this work, five (5) high-priority characteristics of membranes related to VRFB performance were selected as major considerable factors for membrane screening before in-situ testing. Eight (8) state-of-the-art of commercially available ion exchange membranes (IEMs) were specifically selected, evaluated and compared by a set of ex-situ assessment approaches to determine the possibility of the membranes applied for VRFB. The results recommend perfluorosulfonic acid (PFSA) membranes and hydrocarbon anion exchange membranes (AEMs) as the candidates for further in-situ testing, while one hydrocarbon cation exchange membrane (CEM) is not recommended for VRFB application due to its relatively high VO2+ ion crossover and low mechanical stability during/after the chemical stability test. This work could provide VRFB researchers and industry a valuable reference for selecting the polymer membrane materials before VRFB in-situ testing.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available