4.7 Article

Fabrication and Characterization of Chitosan/Cellulose Nanocrystal/Glycerol Bio-Composite Films

Journal

POLYMERS
Volume 13, Issue 7, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/polym13071096

Keywords

chitosan; cellulose nanocrystal; bio-composite films; mechanical properties

Funding

  1. Universitas Gadjah Mada through the research grant of Hibah Penelitian Dasar Unggulan Perguruan Tinggi (PDUPT) [110/UN1/DITLIT/DIT-LIT/LIT/2018, 2645/UN1/DITLIT/DIT-LIT/LT/2019]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The addition of 4 wt% CNC and 20 wt% glycerol can significantly improve the tensile strength and stiffness of chitosan composite films, while adding more than 8 wt% CNC results in a drastic reduction in strength and ductility.
Cellulose nanocrystal (CNC)-reinforced bio-composite films containing glycerol were produced using the solution casting technique. The influences of the addition of CNC (2, 4, and 8 wt%) and glycerol (10, 20, and 30 wt%) on the properties of the bio-composite films were studied in the present work. The resulting films were characterized by X-ray diffraction (XRD), Fourier transform infrared (FT-IR) spectroscopy, and thermogravimetry analysis (TGA), and according to their tensile, water absorption, and light transmission behavior. The introduction of 4 wt% CNC into the chitosan film did not affect the thermal stability, but the presence of 20 wt% glycerol reduced the thermal stability. The addition of 4 wt% CNC to the chitosan film increased its tensile strength, tensile modulus, and elongation at break by 206%, 138%, and 277%, respectively. However, adding more than 8 wt% CNC resulted in a drastic reduction in the strength and ductility of the chitosan film. The highest strength and stiffness of the chitosan bio-composite film were attained with 4 wt% CNC and 20 wt% glycerol. The water absorption and light transmission of the chitosan film were reduced dramatically by the presence of both CNC and glycerol.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available