Translating Co-Design from Face-to-Face to Online: An Australian Primary Producer Project Conducted during COVID-19

Primary producers face considerable risks for poor mental health. While this population can be difficult to engage in programs to prevent poor mental health, approaches tailored to reflect the context of primary producers' life and work have been successful. This paper reports on the co-design phase of a project designed to prevent poor mental health for primary producers-specifically, the advantages, challenges and considerations of translating face-to-face co-design methods to an online environment in response to COVID-19 restrictions. The co-design phase drew upon the existing seven-step co-design framework developed by Trischler and colleagues. Online methods were adopted for all steps of the process. This paper models how this co-design approach can work in an online, primary producer context and details key considerations for future initiatives of this type. The development of online co-design methods is an important additional research method for use not only during a pandemic but also when operating with limited resources or geographic constraints. Results demonstrate the following: (i) co-designing online is possible given adequate preparation, training and resource allocation; (ii) hard to reach populations can be engaged using online methods providing there is adequate early-stage relationship building; (iii) co-design quality need not be compromised and may be improved when translating to online; and (iv) saved costs and resources associated with online methods can be realigned towards intervention/service creation, promotion and user engagement. Suggestions for extending Trischler and colleagues' model are incorporated.

Automated summary

This paper discusses the co-design phase of a project aimed at preventing poor mental health for primary producers, specifically focusing on the advantages, challenges, and considerations of translating face-to-face co-design methods to an online environment in response to COVID-19 restrictions. The results show that online co-design is feasible with proper preparation, training, and resource allocation, and that it can engage hard to reach populations effectively with early-stage relationship building. Quality of co-design does not necessarily suffer when moving to an online platform, and saved costs and resources from online methods can be reallocated towards intervention/service creation, promotion, and user engagement.