4.3 Article

Association of Organizational Behavior with Work Engagement and Work-Home Conflicts of Physician in China

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/ijerph18105405

Keywords

organizational behavior; work engagement; work-home conflicts; physician

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [71273098]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study found that organizational behavior, including organizational fairness, leadership attention, and team interaction, is significantly associated with work engagement and work-home conflicts of physicians. High levels of organizational fairness, leadership attention, and positive team interaction were linked to greater work engagement and lower work-home conflicts among physicians, suggesting that organizational behavior could play a key role in improving physician well-being.
This study aimed to examine how organizational behavior is associated with work engagement (WE) and work-home conflicts (WHCs) of physicians. The data were from a national cross-sectional survey of 3255 Chinese physicians. We examined organizational fairness, leadership attention, and team interaction for organizational behavior. The results indicate that greater organizational fairness is associated with higher WE and lower WHCs. High task fairness was associated with greater pride, and more enjoyment in work, lower sense of guilt towards their family, and less complaints from family members. Physicians reporting higher levels of leaders' attention to their opinions reported experiencing more enjoyment of their work, and less effects on their care for family. A greater number of dinners with colleagues per month was associated with higher WE and lower WHCs, whilst a greater number of clinical case meetings per month was associated with higher WE and higher WHCs. The results suggest that the behavior of organizations could be an important intervention to improve the wellbeing of physicians.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available