4.5 Article

Effect of vaccine effectiveness and safety on COVID-19 vaccine acceptance in Detroit, Michigan, July 2020

Journal

HUMAN VACCINES & IMMUNOTHERAPEUTICS
Volume 17, Issue 9, Pages 2940-2945

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.1080/21645515.2021.1917233

Keywords

COVID-19 vaccine; pandemics; Michigan; adult; race; ethnicity

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation, Division of Social and Economic Sciences [2027836]
  2. Divn Of Social and Economic Sciences
  3. Direct For Social, Behav & Economic Scie [2027836] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study investigated whether acceptance of future COVID-19 vaccines was influenced by an experimental manipulation of vaccine safety and efficacy profiles. Results showed that factors such as gender, age, and beliefs about vaccines had an impact on vaccine acceptance, with lower acceptance rates observed in the Black community.
This study examined whether future COVID-19 vaccine acceptance differed based on an experimental manipulation of the vaccine safety and effectiveness profile. Data come from the Detroit Metro Area Community Study, a population-based study conducted July 15-20, 2020. Participants were asked whether they would get a new COVID-19 vaccine after being randomly assigned information about the vaccine's effectiveness (50% or 95%) and chance of fever (5% or 20%). Among 1,117 Detroiters, 51.3% would accept a COVID-19 vaccine that is 50% effective and 77.1% would accept a vaccine that is 95% effective. Women and adults >= 65 were more accepting of a vaccine; Black Detroiters were less accepting. Believing vaccines to be important, effective, and safe was associated with higher acceptance. Uptake of a COVID-19 may be limited, depending on perceived vaccine effectiveness and general attitudes toward vaccines. Public health approaches to modifying these attitudes will be especially important in the Black community.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available