4.7 Article

Inside Forest Diplomacy: A Case Study of the Congo Basin under Global Environmental Governance

Journal

FORESTS
Volume 12, Issue 5, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/f12050525

Keywords

forest diplomacy; forestland governance; global environmental governance; deforestation; Congo Basin

Categories

Funding

  1. Alexander von Humboldt foundation Bonn, Germany [3.4-CMR-1189288-GF-P]
  2. Georg-AugustUniversitat Gottingen-Germany

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The paper examines the reasons behind the recurrent failures of Congo Basin countries (CBc) within forest diplomacy, finding that lack of strategic and bureaucratic autonomy and dependence on resources from Western cooperation agencies are major contributing factors. Furthermore, it highlights how key actor groups exploit these failures for their private interests while avoiding responsibility in reducing deforestation and biodiversity loss in the Congo Basin.
The growing global interest in biodiversity conservation and the role of forestland sustainability in climate change mitigation has led to the emergence of a new specific field of global environmental governance that we called 'forest diplomacy'. With the largest tropical forest area after the Amazon, Congo Basin countries (CBc) constitute a major negotiation bloc within global forest-related governance arenas. Despite this position, CBc seem embedded in a failure trap with respect to their participation in forest diplomacy arenas. This paper examines the major causes of the recurrent failures of CBc within forest diplomacy. A qualitative empirical approach (including key informant interviews, groups discussion, participant observation, and policy document review) was used. From a conceptual and theoretical perspective, this research combines global and political sociology approaches including environmentality and blame avoidance works. The main finding reveals that the recurrent failures of CBc in forest diplomacy are partly due to the lack of strategic and bureaucratic autonomy of CBc that strongly depend on financial, technical, and knowledge resources from Western cooperation agencies or consultancy firms. Our discussion highlights that this dependency is maintained by most of the key actor groups involved in forest diplomacy related to CBc, as they exploit these failures to serve their private interests while avoiding the blame of not reducing deforestation and biodiversity loss in the Congo Basin.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available