4.7 Article

Identification of Extractives from Various Poplar Species

Journal

FORESTS
Volume 12, Issue 5, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/f12050647

Keywords

gas chromatography with mass spectrometry; poplar wood; wood extractives

Categories

Funding

  1. National Centre of Research and Development [BIOSTRATEG2/298241/10/NCBR/2016]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The chemical composition of extractives in five species of poplar wood was investigated, with a focus on their potential as raw material for biofuel manufacturing. Identification of the extractives is challenging due to the variety of compounds and the large number of individual ones present. Gas chromatography coupled with mass spectrometer was used for the analysis of extractives.
Fast-growing poplar trees from plantations are the source of inexpensive wood that is intended mainly for chemical processing in the pulp and paper industry. Their potential as raw material for biofuel manufacturing is widely discussed as well. The detailed chemical composition of this raw material is therefore an important question. Five species of poplars were investigated: Populus alba, P. maximowiczii, P. trichocarpa, P. nigra, and P. tremula. Wood is a material consisting mainly of lignocellulose, but there are also many extractives. In temperate zone climate they typically represent up to 5% of wood mass. Their identification is difficult, due to various classes of compounds and great number of individual ones. These compounds can affect the properties of wood-its resistance to biotic agents and suitability to enzymatic treatment towards biofuels. Gas chromatography coupled with mass spectrometer (GC-MS) was used to analysis of extractives in various species of poplar wood. Compounds from several classes were identified like phenols, fatty acids, and their derivatives, sterols. Their identification was discussed along with estimation of their content in wood of investigated species.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available