4.5 Review

Collecting eco-evolutionary data in the dark: Impediments to subterranean research and how to overcome them

Journal

ECOLOGY AND EVOLUTION
Volume 11, Issue 11, Pages 5911-5926

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/ece3.7556

Keywords

anchialine; Asellus aquaticus; Astyanax; cave laboratory; computer simulations; experimental design; groundwater; model system; natural laboratory; nonmodel organisms; sampling strategy; stygobite; troglobite

Funding

  1. CAWEB project Testing macroecological theory using simplified systems - European Commission through Horizon 2020 Marie Sklodowska-Curie Actions (MSCA) individual fellowship [882221]
  2. Chinese Academy of Sciences President's International Fellowship Initiative
  3. Tenure Track Pilot Programme of the Croatian Science Foundation
  4. Ecole Polytechnique Federale de Lausanne
  5. Croatian-Swiss Research Programme [TTP-2018-07-9675 EvoDark]
  6. Ministry of Education, Youth and Sports of the Czech Republic [LM2015075, EF16 013/0001782, CZ.02.1.01/0.0/0.0/16 025/0007417]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Caves and other subterranean habitats are suitable experimental model systems for addressing general questions in ecology and evolution, but the harsh working conditions and uniqueness of subterranean organisms make standardized research challenging. The main obstacles are related to habitat difficulties and the rarity of subterranean species, which limit sample size and complicate laboratory experiments.
Caves and other subterranean habitats fulfill the requirements of experimental model systems to address general questions in ecology and evolution. Yet, the harsh working conditions of these environments and the uniqueness of the subterranean organisms have challenged most attempts to pursuit standardized research. Two main obstacles have synergistically hampered previous attempts. First, there is a habitat impediment related to the objective difficulties of exploring subterranean habitats and our inability to access the network of fissures that represents the elective habitat for the so-called cave species. Second, there is a biological impediment illustrated by the rarity of most subterranean species and their low physiological tolerance, often limiting sample size and complicating laboratory experiments. We explore the advantages and disadvantages of four general experimental setups (in situ, quasi in situ, ex situ, and in silico) in the light of habitat and biological impediments. We also discuss the potential of indirect approaches to research. Furthermore, using bibliometric data, we provide a quantitative overview of the model organisms that scientists have exploited in the study of subterranean life. Our over-arching goal is to promote caves as model systems where one can perform standardized scientific research. This is important not only to achieve an in-depth understanding of the functioning of subterranean ecosystems but also to fully exploit their long-discussed potential in addressing general scientific questions with implications beyond the boundaries of this discipline.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available