4.5 Article

Exaggerated evolution of male armaments via male-male competition

Journal

ECOLOGY AND EVOLUTION
Volume 11, Issue 11, Pages 6977-6992

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/ece3.7546

Keywords

armament; evolution; game theory; male competition

Funding

  1. Japan Society for Promotion of Science [15H04420, 17H04731, 17J06741, 18K03453, 19KK0262, 26257405]
  2. UP System Enhanced Creative Work and Research Grant [ECWRG-2018-02-014]
  3. Abdum Salam International Centre for Theoretical Physics (ICTP) Associateship scheme
  4. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [18K03453, 17J06741, 17H04731, 19KK0262] Funding Source: KAKEN

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Researchers explored how competition among males affects the evolution of armaments through a game-theoretic sexual selection model. The study supported the exaggerated evolution hypothesis, showing that male-male competition escalates the rate of evolution of armaments.
Males usually compete to gain access to prospective mates. Through this male-male competition, superior males have a higher chance of passing on their traits to the next generation of male offspring. One category of male traits is armaments, which are weapons used during competition, for example, the chelae of fiddler crabs and the antlers of deer. One consequence of intrasexual selection is the exaggerated evolution of armaments, which can be limited by trade-offs, such as trade-offs with male body size. Here, we formulate a game-theoretic sexual selection model to explore the exaggerated evolution of armaments through male-male competition. The model is used to determine how competition affects the evolution of an armament that is subject to trade-offs. Our simulation can be used to support the exaggerated evolution hypothesis, that is, male-male competition escalates the rate of evolution of armaments.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available