4.8 Article

Transcriptional and epi-transcriptional dynamics of SARS-CoV-2 during cellular infection

Journal

CELL REPORTS
Volume 35, Issue 6, Pages -

Publisher

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.celrep.2021.109108

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. NHMRC [GNT1130084]
  2. University of Melbourne Driving research momentum award
  3. NHMRC EU [GNT1195743]
  4. NHMRC Investigator grant
  5. Australian Government Department of Health
  6. Miller Foundation
  7. Australian Government Research Training Programme (RTP) scholarship

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study reveals that SARS-CoV-2 utilizes sgRNA for protein replication and immune evasion, with TRS-dependent sgRNA upregulating earlier in infection. Additionally, TRS-independent sgRNA containing nsp1 joins to ORF10 and double-junction sgRNA have been identified. The research highlights the dynamic nature of the SARS-CoV-2 transcriptome during its replication cycle.
Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) uses subgenomic RNA (sgRNA) to produce viral proteins for replication and immune evasion. We apply long-read RNA and cDNA sequencing to in vitro human and primate infection models to study transcriptional dynamics. Transcription- regulating sequence (TRS)-dependent sgRNA upregulates earlier in infection than TRS-independent sgRNA. An abundant class of TRS-independent sgRNA consisting of a portion of open reading frame 1ab (ORF1ab) containing nsp1 joins to ORF10, and the 30 untranslated region (UTR) upregulates at 48 h post-infection in human cell lines. We identify double-junction sgRNA containing both TRS-dependent and -independent junctions. We find multiple sites at which the SARS-CoV-2 genome is consistently more modified than sgRNA and that sgRNA modifications are stable across transcript clusters, host cells, and time since infection. Our work highlights the dynamic nature of the SARS-CoV-2 transcriptome during its replication cycle.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available