4.8 Article

High-fidelity estimates of spikes and subthreshold waveforms from 1-photon voltage imaging in vivo

Journal

CELL REPORTS
Volume 35, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.celrep.2021.108954

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. Harvard Data Science Initiative, NIH [R01MH117042]
  2. Howard Hughes Medical Institute
  3. NIH [R01EB22913]
  4. FAS Division of the Science Research Computing Group at Harvard University

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study presents an improved signal extraction pipeline that can resolve supra- and subthreshold voltages of neurons in vivo. The method incorporates biophysical and optical constraints, and has been validated with experimental and simulated datasets to demonstrate its effectiveness. Applications to various brain regions and different genetically encoded voltage indicators have been shown.
The ability to probe the membrane potential of multiple genetically defined neurons simultaneously would have a profound impact on neuroscience research. Genetically encoded voltage indicators are a promising tool for this purpose, and recent developments have achieved a high signal-to-noise ratio in vivo with 1-photon fluorescence imaging. However, these recordings exhibit several sources of noise and signal extraction remains a challenge. We present an improved signal extraction pipeline, spike-guided penalized matrix decomposition-nonnegative matrix factorization (SGPMD-NMF), which resolves supra- and subthreshold voltages in vivo. The method incorporates biophysical and optical constraints. We validate the pipeline with simultaneous patch-clamp and optical recordings from mouse layer 1 in vivo and with simulated and composite datasets with realistic noise. We demonstrate applications to mouse hippocampus expressing paQuasAr3-s or SomArchon1, mouse cortex expressing SomArchon1 or Voltron, and zebrafish spines expressing zArchon1.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available