4.8 Article

An interdependent network of functional enhancers regulates transcription and EZH2 loading at the INK4a/ARF locus

Journal

CELL REPORTS
Volume 34, Issue 12, Pages -

Publisher

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.celrep.2021.108898

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. Department of Atomic Energy, Government of India [12-RD-TFR-5.04-0800]
  2. NCBS-TIFR
  3. Welcome [IA: IA/1/14/2/501539]
  4. CSIR-SRF
  5. SPM-CSIR, India
  6. NCBS/TIFR graduate program

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study investigates the regulatory mechanism of the INK4a/ARF locus and finds that the enhancers within this locus interact interdependently in transcriptional control. Deletion of a single enhancer leads to unexpected collapse of the entire gene region, mimicking 9p21-associated diseases. The results highlight the complex dependencies of promoter-interacting enhancers on each other.
The INK4a/ARF locus encodes important cell-cycle regulators p14(ARF), p15(INK4b), and p16(INK4a). The neighboring gene desert to this locus is the most reproducible GWAS hotspot that harbors one of the densest enhancer clusters in the genome. However, how multiple enhancers that overlap with GWAS variants regulate the INK4a/ARF locus is unknown, which is an important step in linking genetic variation with associated diseases. Here, we show that INK4a/ARF promoters interact with a subset of enhancers in the cluster, independent of their H3K27ac and eRNA levels. Interacting enhancers transcriptionally control each other and INK4a/ ARF promoters over long distances as an interdependent single unit. The deletion of even a single interacting enhancer results in an unexpected collapse of the entire enhancer cluster and leads to EZH2 enrichment on promoters in an ANRIL-independent manner. Dysregulated genes genome-wide mimic 9p21-associated diseases under these scenarios. Our results highlight intricate dependencies of promoter-interacting enhancers on each other.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available