4.1 Article

Implementing Partnering for Change in Quebec: Occupational Therapy Activities and Stakeholders' Perceptions

Publisher

SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC
DOI: 10.1177/0008417421994368

Keywords

Coaching; Collaboration; Response to intervention; Tiered approaches; Universal design

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study documented the implementation of the P4C model in two Quebec elementary schools, including therapy practices, impacts, influencing factors, and recommendations. The findings highlighted the focus of therapy activities and the importance of relationship-building in facilitating the implementation of this model. Lessons learned may be beneficial for others implementing P4C in different contexts.
Background. The occupational therapy school-based Partnering for Change (P4C) model has mostly been documented in Ontario. Purpose. This implementation study describes the implementation of P4C in two Quebec elementary schools (P4C-Q), as well as therapy practices, their impacts, factors perceived to influence implementation, and recommendations. Method. A sequential mixed-methods design was applied. Therapists (n=2) completed daily journals, describing activities by P4C-Q level. Therapists and other school-stakeholders (n=11) participated in semi-structured interviews, analyzed through a content analysis framework. Findings. Daily journals illustrated that the majority of therapy time was spent on activities targeting the entire classroom, and on collaboration with educators. Interviews illustrated how coaching was used across different practices and the impact of these practices for schools (e.g., capacity-building) and children (e.g., increased functioning), and highlighted how relationship-building is key to facilitating the implementation of this model. Implications. Lessons learned may be helpful for others implementing P4C in their own contexts.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available