4.6 Article

Modelling the impact of the tier system on SARS-CoV-2 transmission in the UK between the first and second national lockdowns

Journal

BMJ OPEN
Volume 11, Issue 4, Pages -

Publisher

BMJ PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-050346

Keywords

COVID-19; epidemiology; infectious diseases

Funding

  1. Vaccine Efficacy Evaluation for Priority Emerging Diseases (VEEPED) from the National Institute for Health Research [NIHR: PR-OD-1017-20002]
  2. NIHR BRC Imperial College NHS Trust Infection theme
  3. Academy of Medical Sciences Springboard award [SBF004\1080]
  4. UK Medical Research Council [MR/R015600/1]
  5. UK Department for International Development
  6. NIHR Health Protection Research Unit in Modelling Methodology
  7. NIHR BRC Imperial College NHS Trust COVID-19 theme
  8. Community Jameel
  9. MRC [MR/R015600/1] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This modelling study in the UK found that the tier system had varying effects on reducing transmission of COVID-19, with tiers 2 and 3 showing significant reductions in transmission rates. However, the study also highlighted that more stringent interventions similar to tier 3 are needed to effectively suppress transmission, especially with the presence of more transmissible variants.
Objective To measure the effects of the tier system on the COVID-19 pandemic in the UK between the first and second national lockdowns, before the emergence of the B.1.1.7 variant of concern. Design This is a modelling study combining estimates of real-time reproduction number R-t (derived from UK case, death and serological survey data) with publicly available data on regional non-pharmaceutical interventions. We fit a Bayesian hierarchical model with latent factors using these quantities to account for broader national trends in addition to subnational effects from tiers. Setting The UK at lower tier local authority (LTLA) level. 310 LTLAs were included in the analysis. Primary and secondary outcome measures Reduction in real-time reproduction number R-t. Results Nationally, transmission increased between July and late September, regional differences notwithstanding. Immediately prior to the introduction of the tier system, R-t averaged 1.3 (0.9-1.6) across LTLAs, but declined to an average of 1.1 (0.86-1.42) 2 weeks later. Decline in transmission was not solely attributable to tiers. Tier 1 had negligible effects. Tiers 2 and 3, respectively, reduced transmission by 6% (5%-7%) and 23% (21%-25%). 288 LTLAs (93%) would have begun to suppress their epidemics if every LTLA had gone into tier 3 by the second national lockdown, whereas only 90 (29%) did so in reality. Conclusions The relatively small effect sizes found in this analysis demonstrate that interventions at least as stringent as tier 3 are required to suppress transmission, especially considering more transmissible variants, at least until effective vaccination is widespread or much greater population immunity has amassed.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available