4.6 Article

Qualitative study: patients' enduring concerns about discussing internet use in general practice consultations

Journal

BMJ OPEN
Volume 11, Issue 4, Pages -

Publisher

BMJ PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-047508

Keywords

primary care; qualitative research; world wide web technology

Funding

  1. National Institute for Health Research School for Primary Care Research [284]
  2. Laidlaw Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Patients use the internet to find health information before seeing a doctor, but they are uncertain and hesitant about how to share this information and disclose their online research efforts, fearing they may appear disrespectful or disrupt the consultation process.
ObjectivesTo examine patients' accounts of their use of the internet before seeing a general practitioner (GP) using thematic analysis of semistructured interviews.DesignQualitative semistructured interview study with transcripts analysed thematically.SettingPrimary care patients consulting with 10 GPs working at 7 GP practices of varying sizes and at a range of locations around London and the Southeast of England.Participants28 adult patients: 16 women and 12 men ranging in age from 18 to 75 from a range of self-defined ethnic backgrounds. Participants were selected based on instances when the patients reported having used the internet before the consultation, when patients referred to the internet in the consultation or when the physician used the internet or made reference to it during the consultation.ResultsPatients report that they can find health information online that they believe is reliable and helpful for both themselves and their GP. However, they report uncertainty about how to share internet-based findings and reluctance to disclose their efforts at researching health issues online for fear of appearing disrespectful or interfering with the flow of the consultation.ConclusionsDespite the democratisation of access to information about health due via the internet, patients continue to experience their use of the internet for health information as a sensitive and potentially problematic topic. The onus may well be on GPs to raise the likelihood (without judgement) that patients will have looked things up before consulting and invite them to talk about what they found.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available