4.6 Review

Clinical practice guidelines for the management of atraumatic shoulder conditions: protocol for a systematic review

Journal

BMJ OPEN
Volume 11, Issue 4, Pages -

Publisher

BMJ PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-048297

Keywords

shoulder; protocols & guidelines; public health

Funding

  1. Australian National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) [APP1113532]
  2. Cabrini Medical Staff Executive Research Scholarship 2020
  3. NHMRC Translating Research into Practice (TRIP) Fellowship [APP1168749]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This systematic review aims to identify, appraise, and compare clinical practice guidelines for atraumatic shoulder conditions. The study will involve a systematic search, quality appraisal, and comparison of recommendations from each guideline. The results will be reported according to PRISMA guidelines and disseminated to relevant stakeholders.
Introduction Shoulder conditions are a major cause of morbidity in the general population. Many clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) for shoulder conditions have been developed. Their purpose is to provide evidence-based recommendations to assist clinicians in providing optimal care to maximise patient outcomes. The aim of this systematic review is to identify, appraise, and compare the content and quality of CPGs for atraumatic shoulder conditions. Methods and analysis CPGs for atraumatic shoulder conditions will be included provided they make recommendations about diagnosis and/or management, are identified by their authors as a guideline and are consistent with the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation (AGREE) II definition of a guideline. A systematic search of electronic databases, online guideline repositories and the websites of relevant professional societies will be conducted to identify eligible CPGs. Search terms relating to shoulder conditions (eg, 'adhesive capsulitis', 'rotator cuff' and 'bursitis') will be combined with a validated search filter for CPGs. Pairs of independent reviewers will determine eligibility of CPGs identified by the search. Quality appraisal of included CPGs will be performed using the AGREE II instrument. Recommendations from each CPG and how they were determined will be extracted and compared across similar CPGs. Results from this systematic review will be reported according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis statement. Ethics and dissemination Ethical approval is not required for this systematic review. The results from this study will be published in a peer-reviewed journal and disseminated to professional societies that publish shoulder CPGs, clinical policy groups, clinicians, researchers and consumers. PROSPERO registration number CRD42020182723.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available