4.6 Review

Healthy Food Prescription Programs and their Impact on Dietary Behavior and Cardiometabolic Risk Factors: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Journal

ADVANCES IN NUTRITION
Volume 12, Issue 5, Pages 1944-1956

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1093/advances/nmab039

Keywords

food is medicine; chronic diseases; global burden of disease; food policy; nutrition; diet; food pharmacy; food insecurity; culinary medicine; public health

Funding

  1. National Health and Medical Research Council Centre for Research Excellence in reducing salt intake using food policy interventions [APP1117300]
  2. University of New South Wales Scientia Fellowship
  3. NIH [2 R01 HL115189]
  4. Australian Government

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study conducted a systematic review of healthy food prescription programs and found that such programs can increase fruit and vegetable consumption, reduce BMI, and lower HbA1c. However, there are significant heterogeneity, methodological limitations, and moderate to very low certainty of evidence in the included studies. Well-designed, large, randomized controlled trials are needed to further establish the efficacy of healthy food prescription programs.
The enormous burden of diet-related chronic diseases has prompted interest in healthy food prescription programs. Yet, the impact of such programs remains unclear. The aim of this study was to conduct a systematic review of healthy food prescription programs and evaluate their impact on dietary behavior and cardiometabolic parameters by meta-analysis. A systematic search was carried out in Medline, Embase, Scopus, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials databases since their inception to 3 January, 2020 without language restriction. A systematic search of interventional studies investigating the effect of healthy food prescription on diet quality and/or cardiometabolic risk factors including BMI, systolic (SBP) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP), glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c), or blood lipids was carried out. Thirteen studies were identified for inclusion, most of which were quasi-experimental (pre/post) interventions without a control group (n = 9). Pooled estimates revealed a 22% (95% CI: 12, 32; n = 5 studies, n = 1039 participants; I-2 = 97%) increase in fruit and vegetable consumption, corresponding to 0.8 higher daily servings (95% CI: 0.2, 1.4; I-2 = 96%). BMI decreased by 0.6 kg/m(2) (95% CI: 0.2, 1.1; I-2 = 6.4%) and HbA1c by 0.8% (95% CI: 0.1, 1.6; I-2 = 92%). No significant change was observed in other cardiometabolic parameters. These findings should be interpreted with caution in light of considerable heterogeneity, methodological limitations of the included studies, and moderate to very low certainty of evidence. Our results support the need for well-designed, large, randomized controlled trials in various settings to further establish the efficacy of healthy food prescription programs on diet quality and cardiometabolic health.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available