4.7 Article

Lay participation with medical expertise in online self-care practices: Social knowledge (co)production in the Running Mania injury forum

Journal

SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE
Volume 277, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2021.113880

Keywords

Lay expertise; Coproduction; Tinkering; Medical expertise; Participation; Online health; Self-care; Running

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Recent literature in the public understanding of science has shifted towards encouraging public participation and dialogue rather than the deficit model of public communication. This study examines how laypersons engage in self-care practices and collectively negotiate medical expertise in an online environment. Through interviews and observations, the study analyzes the production of knowledge within a wellness community and suggests that the logic of care has the potential to bridge the expert/lay boundary in medical expertise.
Recent literature on the public understanding of science has focused on replacing the deficit model of public communication in which experts disseminate information with one that encourages public participation and dialogue. Situated within this call for increased participation, this study looks at self-care practices in which medical expertise is not passively consumed by the layperson, but shared and (re)produced through arenas of lay practice. This collective knowledge production is facilitated by the online environment, which provides access to mediated medical knowledge and the ability to form communities in which users can negotiate this expertise and share their experiences. The laypersons examined here are members of the Canadian online collective, Running Mania, highlighting how this negotiation of expertise occurs in a wellness community. Drawing from member interviews and website observations of the site's injury forum, the study examines collective injury management using two dominant theoretical discourses surrounding lay knowledge and participation in medical expertise: the lay expert whose knowledge arises from experience and the expert patient whose knowledge base parallels dominant biomedical discourse. Using the coproduction model and the related concepts of tinkering and logic of care from material semiotics, the research examines how these knowledge forms articulate to produce an intermediary discourse unique to this collective's articulation of running and caring practices, a discourse that is enacted in individuals' embodied negotiation of these multiple forms of medical expertise. It suggests that the logic of care has the potential to bridge the expert/lay boundary since the need for persistent, attentive tinkering applies across epistemological divides: in good care practices, multiple expertises are needed, both expert and lay, to hold the body together.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available