4.7 Article

Zonally asymmetric phytoplankton response to the Southern annular mode in the marginal sea of the Southern ocean

Journal

SCIENTIFIC REPORTS
Volume 11, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-89720-4

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Korean Ministry of Oceans and Fisheries [KIMST20190361, PM19020]
  2. National Research Foundation of Korea [NRF-2018R1A5A1024958]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The positive phase of the Southern annular mode (SAM) is associated with enhanced and poleward-shifted westerly winds, leading to physical and biogeochemical responses over the Southern ocean. Chlorophyll concentration in the Southern Ocean shows zonally asymmetric responses to SAM due to different limiting factors of phytoplankton growth per region, with increases in the western Amundsen-Ross Sea but decreases in the D'Urville Sea.
Antarctic marine biological variability modulates climate systems via the biological pump. However, the knowledge of biological response in the Southern Ocean to climate variability still has been lack of understanding owing to limited ocean color data in the high latitude region. We investigated the surface chlorophyll concentration responses to the Southern annular mode (SAM) in the marginal sea of the Southern ocean using satellite observation and reanalysis data focusing on the austral summer. The positive phase of SAM is associated with enhanced and poleward-shifted westerly winds, leading to physical and biogeochemical responses over the Southern ocean. Our result indicates that chlorophyll has strong zonally asymmetric responses to SAM owing to different limiting factors of phytoplankton growth per region. For the positive SAM phase, chlorophyll tends to increase in the western Amundsen-Ross Sea but decreases in the D'Urville Sea. It is suggested that the distinct limiting factors are associated with the seasonal variability of sea ice and upwelling per region.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available