4.7 Article

Syringeal vocal folds do not have a voice in zebra finch vocal development

Journal

SCIENTIFIC REPORTS
Volume 11, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-85929-5

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Danish Research Council [DFF 5051-00195]
  2. Carlsberg Foundation [CF17-0949]
  3. Novo Nordisk Foundation [NNF17OC0028928]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study suggests that in songbirds, although the sound generator within the syrinx does not change during development, the observed acoustic changes in vocal development are attributed to changes in the motor control pathway, from song system circuitry to muscle force. The researchers propose that muscle use and training driven by the sexually dimorphic song system are crucial drivers for sexual dimorphism in the syringeal skeleton and musculature.
Vocal behavior can be dramatically changed by both neural circuit development and postnatal maturation of the body. During song learning in songbirds, both the song system and syringeal muscles are functionally changing, but it is unknown if maturation of sound generators within the syrinx contributes to vocal development. Here we densely sample the respiratory pressure control space of the zebra finch syrinx in vitro. We show that the syrinx produces sound very efficiently and that key acoustic parameters, minimal fundamental frequency, entropy and source level, do not change over development in both sexes. Thus, our data suggest that the observed acoustic changes in vocal development must be attributed to changes in the motor control pathway, from song system circuitry to muscle force, and not by material property changes in the avian analog of the vocal folds. We propose that in songbirds, muscle use and training driven by the sexually dimorphic song system are the crucial drivers that lead to sexual dimorphism of the syringeal skeleton and musculature. The size and properties of the instrument are thus not changing, while its player is.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available