4.7 Article

Sentinel node biopsy alone for breast cancer patients with residual nodal disease after neoadjuvant chemotherapy

Journal

SCIENTIFIC REPORTS
Volume 11, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

NATURE RESEARCH
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-88442-x

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. grant (Elimination of Cancer Project Fund) from the Asan Cancer Institute of Asan Medical Center, Seoul [2017-1341]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study analyzed the long-term outcomes of patients with residual N1 nodal disease following neoadjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer and found that omission of axillary lymph node dissection using propensity score matching was oncologically safe. No significant differences in axillary recurrence-free survival, distant metastasis-free survival, overall survival, and breast cancer-free survival were observed between SLNB only group and ALND group after propensity score matching.
For residual N1 nodal disease following neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) for patients with breast cancer, the optimal local therapy for axilla is an evolving area. We analyzed the long-term results of these patients according to axillary surgical methods using propensity score matching (PSM) to clarify whether omission of axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) is oncologically safe. This was a single institution retrospective study of patients with ypN1 from Asan Medical Center (AMC). We included 324 patients who had undergone axillary surgery with either sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) only or ALND. The patients received NAC at AMC between 2008 and 2013. General indications for ALND included prominent nodes detected clinically before NAC, evident macrometastasis on multiple nodes during SLNB. Patients who had either micrometastasis or macrometastasis in 1 or 2 node(s) were included. SLNB was performed for patients with good responders to NAC with limited nodal burden. Patients were matched for baseline characteristics. After matching, we included 98 patients in each SLNB only group and ALND group respectively. We compared axillary recurrence-free survival (ARFS), distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS), overall survival (OS), and breast cancer-free survival (BCSS) according to the surgical method. The median follow-up period was 71 months. Univariate and multivariate analyses revealed no statistically significant differences between the two groups for ARFS, DMFS, OS, and BCSS. After the propensity score matching, no significant statistical differences were observed in 5-year ARFS, DMFS, OS, and BCSS between the SLNB only group and ALND group. SLNB might be a possible option for ALND in patients with breast cancer who have limited axillary node metastasis after NAC without compromising survival outcomes.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available