4.7 Article

Dating the landscape evolution around the Chauvet-Pont d'Arc cave

Journal

SCIENTIFIC REPORTS
Volume 11, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

NATURE RESEARCH
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-88240-5

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Rhone-Alpes regional council [CPER07_13 CIRA]
  2. OSUG@2020 Labex [ANR10 LABX56]
  3. Equip@Meso project of the French National Research Agency's Investissements d'Avenir program [ANR-10-EQPX-29-01]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study aims to reconstruct the landscape around the Chauvet Cave during the Upper Paleolithic by dating the formation of the Pont d'Arc natural arch, which was found to have formed between 108 and 138 ka, before the first known human presence in the cave around 37 ka cal BP.
The Chauvet cave (UNESCO World Heritage site, France) is located in the Ardeche Gorge, a unique physical and cultural landscape. Its setting within the gorge-overlooking a meander cutoff containing a natural arch called the Pont d'Arc-is also remarkable. Investigating possible associations between sites' physical and cultural settings, chronologies of human occupation, and access conditions has become a major theme in archeological research. The present study aims to reconstruct the landscape of the Pont d'Arc meander cutoff during the Upper Paleolithic, when humans were present in the Chauvet Cave. We used uranium-series and electron spin resonance analyses to date the formation of the Pont d'Arc natural arch in the Combe d'Arc meander cutoff, near the Chauvet Cave. Results show that the meander became totally cutoff between 108 and 138 ka (95%). Hence, the natural arch formed before the Upper Paleolithic and the first known human presence in the Chauvet Cave, dated to 37 ka cal BP. These results allowed us to reconstruct a key part of the landscape surrounding the Chauvet Cave when it was being used by Upper-Paleolithic societies.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available