4.7 Article

Population-based serology reveals risk factors for RSV infection in children younger than 5 years

Journal

SCIENTIFIC REPORTS
Volume 11, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-88524-w

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Respiratory Syncytial Virus Consortium in Europe (RESCEU)
  2. Innovative Medicines Initiative 2 Joint Undertaking [116019]
  3. EU's Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme
  4. European Federation of Pharmaceutical Industries and Associations

Ask authors/readers for more resources

RSV infection is a common occurrence in children, with the majority experiencing it before the age of 2. Age and birthdate are significant predictors of RSV infection probability, with children born in summer having a higher likelihood of infection.
Respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) infection is a leading cause of hospitalization in infants. Underlying risk factors for RSV infection in the general population are not well understood, as previous work has focused on severe outcomes of infection in a clinical setting. Here we use RSV-specific IgG and IgA antibody measurements from two population-based cross-sectional serosurveys carried out in the Netherlands (n=682) to classify children up to 5 years as seronegative or seropositive. We employ a generalized additive model to estimate the probability of prior RSV infection as function of age, date of birth within the year, and other risk factors. The analyses show that the majority of children have experienced a RSV infection before the age of 2 years. Age and birthdate are strong predictors of RSV infection in the first years of life, and children born in summer have higher estimated probability of infection than those born in winter [e.g., 0.56 (95% CI 0.45-0.66) vs. 0.32 (0.21-0.45) at age 1 year]. Our analyses reveal that the mean age at infection depends on date of birth, which has implications for the design of vaccination programmes and prioritisation schemes for the prophylactic use of monoclonal antibodies.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available