4.7 Article

Detecting network anomalies using Forman-Ricci curvature and a case study for human brain networks

Journal

SCIENTIFIC REPORTS
Volume 11, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-87587-z

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NSF [IIS-1814405, IIS-1814931]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study analyzes networks of functional correlations between brain regions to identify changes caused by ADHD, proposing the use of Forman-Ricci curvature for measuring curvature in the network. The comparison between Forman-Ricci curvature and Ollivier-Ricci curvature shows that they are not well correlated, and the comparative analysis of curvature can identify changes that traditional approaches cannot.
We analyze networks of functional correlations between brain regions to identify changes in their structure caused by Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (adhd). We express the task for finding changes as a network anomaly detection problem on temporal networks. We propose the use of a curvature measure based on the Forman-Ricci curvature, which expresses higher-order correlations among two connected nodes. Our theoretical result on comparing this Forman-Ricci curvature with another well-known notion of network curvature, namely the Ollivier-Ricci curvature, lends further justification to the assertions that these two notions of network curvatures are not well correlated and therefore one of these curvature measures cannot be used as an universal substitute for the other measure. Our experimental results indicate nine critical edges whose curvature differs dramatically in brains of adhd patients compared to healthy brains. The importance of these edges is supported by existing neuroscience evidence. We demonstrate that comparative analysis of curvature identifies changes that more traditional approaches, for example analysis of edge weights, would not be able to identify.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available