4.5 Article

Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumour: Correlation of apparent diffusion coefficient or WHO classification with recurrence-free survival

Journal

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY
Volume 85, Issue 3, Pages 680-687

Publisher

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2015.12.029

Keywords

Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumour; Magnetic resonance imaging; Apparent diffusion coefficient; Treatment outcome; WHO classification

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose: To evaluate the correlation between grade of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumours (pNETs) based on the 2010 World Health Organization (WHO) classification and the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC), and to assess whether the ADC value and WHO classification can predict recurrence-free survival (RFS) after surgery for pNETs. Methods: This retrospective study was approved by the Institutional Review Board. The requirement for informed consent was waived. Between March 2009 and November 2014, forty-nine patients who underwent magnetic resonance (MR) imaging with diffusion-weighted image and subsequent surgery for single pNETs were included. Correlations among qualitative MR imaging findings, quantitative ADC values, and WHO classifications were assessed. An ordered logistic regression test was used to control for tumour size as a confounding factor. The association between ADC value (or WHO classification) and RFS was analysed. Results: All tumors (n = 49) were classified as low-(n = 29, grade 1), intermediate-(n = 17, grade 2), and high-grade (n = 3, grade 3), respectively. The mean ADC of pNETs was moderately negatively correlated with WHO classification before and after adjustment for tumour size (p= 0.64, p <0.001 and p= 0.55, p = 0.001 respectively). RFS was significantly associated with WHO classification (p = 0.007), but not with the ADC value (p = 0.569). Conclusion: The ADC value of pNETs is moderately correlated with WHO tumour grade, regardless of tumour size. However, the WHO tumour classification of pNET may be more suitable for predicting RFS than the ADC value. 2015 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available