4.7 Article

A numerical investigation of changes in lens shape during accommodation

Journal

SCIENTIFIC REPORTS
Volume 11, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

NATURE RESEARCH
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-89145-z

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Spanish Ministerio de ciencia, innovacion y universidades [DPI2017-84047-R]
  2. Department of Industry and Innovation (Government of Aragon) [T24-20R]
  3. [PRE2018-084021]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study aimed to investigate how the mechanical properties and geometry of the lens influence the changes in lens shape during accommodation, and found that the stiffness ratio between the nucleus and cortex and the stiffness of the capsule, specifically the posterior surface, are the predominant factors affecting the shape change.
The purpose of this study was to investigate how the mechanical properties and geometry of the lens influence the changes in lens shape during accommodation. To do so, ex vivo stretching tests of the isolated lens were simulated via finite element analysis. In these tests, the lens is stretched from the accommodated state to the non-accommodated state. Several key characteristics of the lens were studied: the stiffness gradient of the lens material, the distribution of the capsule thickness, the mechanical properties of the capsule and the material comprising the lens, nucleus and cortex, and the influence of two different age-related lens geometries (17 and 29 y/o subjects). To determine the effects on the changes in lens shape during accommodation, changes in the anterior and posterior radius, the lens and nucleus thicknesses and the equatorial lens diameter were analysed. The results suggest that multiple factors exert statistically significant influences on how the lens changes its shape, but two factors predominate over the rest: the stiffness ratio between the nucleus and cortex and the stiffness of the capsule, specifically the posterior surface.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available