4.7 Article

Quantified assessment of hyperactivity in ADHD youth using IR-UWB radar

Journal

SCIENTIFIC REPORTS
Volume 11, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

NATURE RESEARCH
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-89024-7

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Bio and Medical Technology Development Program (Next, Generation Biotechnology) through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) - Ministry of Science, ICT and Future Planning [NRF-2017M3A9E2064735]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Research on quantifying hyperactivity in youth with ADHD has been limited and inconsistent. This study tested the discriminative value of IR-UWB radar for monitoring hyperactive individuals with ADHD and healthy controls, finding significant differences in activity levels over time. Further studies with larger sample sizes are needed to investigate the effects of age, sex, and ADHD subtype on activity level function.
Research on the quantification of hyperactivity in youth with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) has been limited and inconsistent. The purpose of this study was to test the discriminative value of impulse-radio ultra-wideband (IR-UWB) radar for monitoring hyperactive individuals with ADHD and healthy controls (HCs). A total of 10 ADHD patients and 15 HCs underwent hyperactivity assessment using IR-UWB radar during a 22-min continuous performance test. We applied functional ANOVA to compare the mean functions of activity level between the 2 groups. We found that the mean function of activity over time was significantly different and that the activity level of the ADHD group slightly increased over time with high dispersion after approximately 7 min, which means that the difference in activity level between the two groups became evident at this period. Further studies with larger sample sizes and longer test times are warranted to investigate the effect of age, sex, and ADHD subtype on activity level function.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available