4.7 Article

Machine-learning based prediction of Cushing's syndrome in dogs attending UK primary-care veterinary practice

Journal

SCIENTIFIC REPORTS
Volume 11, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-88440-z

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Dechra Veterinary Products Ltd
  2. Kennel Club
  3. Kennel Club Charitable Trust

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study found that machine-learning methods could predict the future diagnosis of Cushing's syndrome in dogs with good predictive performance. These methods support clinical decision-making and contribute to improved diagnosis of Cushing's syndrome in dogs.
Cushing's syndrome is an endocrine disease in dogs that negatively impacts upon the quality-of-life of affected animals. Cushing's syndrome can be a challenging diagnosis to confirm, therefore new methods to aid diagnosis are warranted. Four machine-learning algorithms were applied to predict a future diagnosis of Cushing's syndrome, using structured clinical data from the VetCompass programme in the UK. Dogs suspected of having Cushing's syndrome were included in the analysis and classified based on their final reported diagnosis within their clinical records. Demographic and clinical features available at the point of first suspicion by the attending veterinarian were included within the models. The machine-learning methods were able to classify the recorded Cushing's syndrome diagnoses, with good predictive performance. The LASSO penalised regression model indicated the best overall performance when applied to the test set with an AUROC=0.85 (95% CI 0.80-0.89), sensitivity=0.71, specificity=0.82, PPV=0.75 and NPV=0.78. The findings of our study indicate that machine-learning methods could predict the future diagnosis of a practicing veterinarian. New approaches using these methods could support clinical decision-making and contribute to improved diagnosis of Cushing's syndrome in dogs.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available