4.7 Article

Identification of risk factors for retinal vascular events in a population-based cross-sectional study in Rumoi, Japan

Journal

SCIENTIFIC REPORTS
Volume 11, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

NATURE RESEARCH
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-85655-y

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Asahikawa Medical University

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study found that self-reported diabetes mellitus was a significant risk factor for retinal vascular events in both men and women, while higher systolic blood pressure and lower frequency of meat consumption were associated with the events in men. In women, self-reported hypertension was linked to retinal vascular events, but not with systolic blood pressure. Women with hypertension may require extra care beyond blood pressure management.
We conducted a population-based, cross-sectional study in Japan to identify risk factors for retinal vascular events separately by gender. Forty years or older participants were recruited. Fundus photographs were taken, and lifestyle and health characteristics were determined through a questionnaire and physical examinations. We compared the group of those who had retinal vascular events and those who did not. A total of 1689 participants (964 men) were deemed eligible for the study and retinal vascular events were seen in 59 subjects (3.7% of the men, 3.2% of the women). Self-reported diabetes mellitus was significantly associated with the vascular events in each gender [odds ratio (OR)=6.97, 6.19 (men, women); 95% confidence interval (CI) 3.02-15.9, 2.25-17.0; p<0.001]. Higher systolic blood pressure (OR=1.03; 95% CI 1.01-1.04; p=0.006) and lower frequency of meat consumption (OR=0.73; 95% CI 0.54-0.99; p=0.04) were independently associated with the vascular events in men. In women, while vascular events were associated with self-reported hypertension (OR=2.64; 95% CI 1.03-6.74; p=0.04), no association was seen with systolic blood pressure. Women with hypertension may need extra care, not only for blood pressure.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available