4.5 Article

Value of ultra-low-dose chest CT with iterative reconstruction for selected emergency room patients with acute dyspnea

Journal

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY
Volume 85, Issue 9, Pages 1637-1644

Publisher

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2016.06.024

Keywords

Chest computed tomography; Ultra-low-dose; Iterative; Reconstruction; Radiation protection; Emergency room

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: To compare the diagnostic confidence between low-dose computed-tomography (LDCT) and ultra-low-dose CT (ULDCT) of the chest on a single source CT system (SSCT) for patients with acute dyspnoea. Materials and methods: One hundred thirty-three consecutive dyspnoeic patients referred from the emergency room (ER) were selected to undergo two sequential non -enhanced chest CT acquisitions: LDCT first acquisition (100 kVp and 60 mAs), followed by ULDCT (100 kVp +/- 20 and 10 mAs). Images were reconstructed with sinogram affirmed reconstruction (SAFIRE). Objective and subjective image quality assessments were made. Two radiologists evaluated subjective image quality and the level of diagnostic confidence as certain or uncertain. Results: The mean effective doses (ED) were 1.164 +/- 0.403 and 0.182 +/- 0.028 mSv for LDCT and ULDCT, respectively. Objective image quality improved significantly on lung images of ULDCT compared with LDCT (p < 0.05). Subjective image quality was rated excellent/good in 90% of patients with BMI = 25 kg/m(2) for ULDCT. The level of diagnostic confidence was certain in all cases for both radiologists with excellent inter-observer agreement (k = 1). Conclusion: Chest ULDCT with SAFIRE on a SSCT allows a high level diagnostic confidence for the evaluation of selected acute dyspnoeic patients. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available