4.7 Article

Origin and hydrodynamics of xylem sap in tree stems, and relationship to root uptake of soil water

Journal

SCIENTIFIC REPORTS
Volume 11, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

NATURE RESEARCH
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-87397-3

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS) [17K07024]
  2. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [17K07024] Funding Source: KAKEN

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study estimated the depth at which roots of coniferous and deciduous trees actively absorb soil water to be 20 cm, and found that water circulation in heartwood was significantly slower than in sapwood.
Although 10 years have passed since Japan's Fukushima nuclear accident, the future radiation risk from Cs-137 contamination of wood via root uptake is a serious concern. We estimated the depth at which the roots of evergreen coniferous sugi (Cryptomeria japonica) and broadleaf deciduous konara (Quercus serrata) trees actively take up soil water by using positive delta D values from the artificial D2O tracer and seasonal changes in the delta O-18 values of soil water as a natural environmental tracer. We compared the tracer concentration changes in xylem sap with those in the soil water and ascertained that both tree species primarily took up water from a depth of 20 cm, though with mixing of water from other depths. Using sap hydrodynamics in tree stems, we found that water circulation was significantly slower in heartwood than in sapwood. Heartwood water was not supplied by direct root uptake of soil water. The measured diffusion coefficients for D2O, K+, Cs+, and I- in xylem stems were greater in sapwood than in heartwood, and their magnitude was inversely correlated with their molecular weights. The distribution of D2O and Cs-137 concentrations along the radial stem could be explained by simulations using the simple advective diffusion model.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available