Comparison of three qPCR-based commercial tests for detection of periodontal pathogens

In periodontal practice microbial results of periodontal test kits for identification of key pathogens are an aid in the treatment planning. Information on the performance of commercially available test kits is therefore essential for the clinician. In this retrospective analysis three commercially available qPCR kits for detection and quantification of selected periodontal bacterial species were compared, using 100 clinical samples from patients with untreated periodontitis. The analysis involved two separate comparisons in which kit A (LabOral Diagnostics, The Netherlands) was compared with kit B (Advanced Dental Diagnostics, The Netherlands), and with kit C (OralDent diagnostics, The Netherlands). Analytic procedures for detection and quantification of selected periodontal bacterial species were carried out according to the instructions of the laboratories. Kit A detected target species more often, and absolute numbers of bacterial cells were higher than with kit B. A high degree of similarity was found between the test outcomes by kit A and kit C. All three kits performed satisfactory but small and significant differences exist between kits.

Automated summary

In this study, three commercially available qPCR kits for detecting and quantifying selected periodontal bacterial species were compared using 100 clinical samples. Kit A detected target species more frequently and had higher bacterial cell numbers compared to kit B. There was a high degree of similarity between the outcomes of kits A and C, indicating satisfactory performance with small but significant differences between the three kits.