4.7 Article

Discontinuous phase transitions in the multi-state noisy q-voter model: quenched vs. annealed disorder

Journal

SCIENTIFIC REPORTS
Volume 11, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

NATURE RESEARCH
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-85361-9

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Science Center (NCN, Poland) [2016/21/B/HS6/01256, 2019/35/B/HS6/02530]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study introduces a generalized version of the noisy q-voter model, where voters can be in different states and two types of disorder (annealed and quenched) are considered. The model displays discontinuous phase transitions for any q>1 when the number of states is greater than 2.
We introduce a generalized version of the noisy q-voter model, one of the most popular opinion dynamics models, in which voters can be in one of s >= 2 states. As in the original binary q-voter model, which corresponds to s=2, at each update randomly selected voter can conform to its q randomly chosen neighbors only if they are all in the same state. Additionally, a voter can act independently, taking a randomly chosen state, which introduces disorder to the system. We consider two types of disorder: (1) annealed, which means that each voter can act independently with probability p and with complementary probability 1-p conform to others, and (2) quenched, which means that there is a fraction p of all voters, which are permanently independent and the rest of them are conformists. We analyze the model on the complete graph analytically and via Monte Carlo simulations. We show that for the number of states s>2 the model displays discontinuous phase transitions for any q>1, on contrary to the model with binary opinions, in which discontinuous phase transitions are observed only for q>5. Moreover, unlike the case of s=2, for s>2 discontinuous phase transitions survive under the quenched disorder, although they are less sharp than under the annealed one.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available