4.7 Article

Maintaining higher leaf photosynthesis after heading stage could promote biomass accumulation in rice

Journal

SCIENTIFIC REPORTS
Volume 11, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-86983-9

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Japan Science and Technology Agency, CREST [JPMJCR15O2]
  2. JSPS KAKENHI [JP18K05585, JP19H02939, JP19H02940]
  3. Ibaraki University Grant for Presidential Support for Acceleration of Distinctive Research

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Maintaining a high leaf photosynthetic rate after heading is suggested to be a potential target for enhancing rice biomass accumulation, rather than having a high maximum photosynthetic rate. High photosynthetic rate is positively correlated with crop growth rate, especially when it exceeds 80% of the maximum photosynthetic rate.
Leaf photosynthetic rate changes across the growing season as crop plants age. Most studies of leaf photosynthesis focus on a specific growth stage, leaving the question of which pattern of photosynthetic dynamics maximizes crop productivity unanswered. Here we obtained high-frequency data of canopy leaf CO2 assimilation rate (A) of two elite rice (Oryza sativa) cultivars and 76 inbred lines across the whole growing season. The integrated A value after heading was positively associated with crop growth rate (CGR) from heading to harvest, but that before heading was not. A curve-smoothing analysis of A after heading showed that accumulated A at>80% of its maximum (A(80)) was positively correlated with CGR in analyses of all lines mixed and of lines grouped by genetic background, while the maximum A and accumulated A at <= 80% were less strongly correlated with CGR. We also found a genomic region (similar to 12.2 Mb) that may enhance both A(80) and aboveground biomass at harvest. We propose that maintaining a high A after heading, rather than having high maximum A, is a potential target for enhancing rice biomass accumulation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available