4.5 Article

The role of diffusion-weighted imaging in the detection of hepatic metastases from colorectal cancer: A comparison with unenhanced and Gd-EOB-DTPA enhanced MRI

Journal

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY
Volume 85, Issue 5, Pages 1027-1034

Publisher

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2016.02.011

Keywords

Magnetic resonance imaging; Diffusion weighted imaging; Focal liver lesion(s); Metastases; Colorectal cancer

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objectives: To compare the role of DWI vs. gadoxetic-acid-disodium enhanced MRI in the detection of colorectal hepatic metastases. Methods: Fifty-four patients with 115 hepatic metastases were included in this retrospective study, approved by the Ethical Board. All patients underwent intraoperative-ultrasound and surgical resection within two weeks after MRI. Images were grouped in 4 sets, which were analyzed by two radiologists in different sessions: unenhanced T1-T2w (set A), set A plus DWI (set B), set A plus gadoxetic-acid-disodium (set C), set A plus DWI plus gadoxetic-acid-disodium (set D). For each set, metastases presence/size/site was reported. Interobserver agreement and statistical significance were assessed by Cohen's kappa and Mc-Nemar's test, respectively. Results: Readers' agreement was always very good (k > 0.80). Mean sensitivity values were 84.3/92.1/95.6/97.3% for set A/B/C/D, respectively. Mean specificity, positive predicted, negative predicted, and accuracy values strongly and progressively increased in the various set too: from 62.5% (set A) to 85.0% as for specificity, from 92.8% to 97.3% as for positive predicted value, from 41.0% to 85.1% as for negative predicted value, and from 81.1% to 95.5% as for accuracy. For each reader from set A to D, the number of false negatives progressively decreases. Conclusions: For both readers, DWI improved all statistical parameters in the unenhanced examinations, as for nodules either smaller or greater than 1 cm, while in the EOB-enhanced examinations DWI prevalently increased specificity/negative predictive value. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available