4.6 Article

Rheological and the Fresh State Properties of Alkali-Activated Mortars by Blast Furnace Slag

Journal

MATERIALS
Volume 14, Issue 8, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/ma14082069

Keywords

rheological; blast furnace slag; alkaline activation

Funding

  1. CNPq [301634/2018.1]
  2. FAPERJ [E-26/202.773/2017]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study investigated the fresh and rheological properties of alkali mortars activated by blast furnace slag, finding that sodium content influences mortar behavior, with lower sodium content behaving similarly to cementitious mortars, and higher sodium content exhibiting distinct dynamic viscosity properties.
The fresh and rheological properties of alkali mortars activated by blast furnace slag (BFS) were investigated. Consistency tests, squeeze flow, dropping ball, mass density in the hardened state, incorporated air, and water retention were performed. Mortars were produced with the ratio 1:2:0.45 (binder:sand:water), using not only ordinary Portland cement for control but also BFS, varying the sodium content of the activated alkali mortars from 2.5 to 15%. The results obtained permitted understanding that mortars containing 2.5 to 7.5% sodium present a rheological behavior similar to cementitious mortars by the Bingham model. In turn, the activated alkali mortars containing 10 to 15% sodium showed a very significant change in the properties of dynamic viscosity, which is associated with a change in the type of model, starting to behave similar to the Herschel-Bulkley model. Evaluating the properties of incorporated air and water retention, it appears that mortars containing 12.5% and 15% sodium do not have compatible properties, which is related to the occupation of sodium ions in the interstices of the material. Thus, it is concluded that the techniques used were consistent in the rheological characterization of activated alkali mortars.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available