4.6 Article

Porous Structure of Ultra-High-Performance Fibre-Reinforced Concretes

Journal

MATERIALS
Volume 14, Issue 7, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/ma14071637

Keywords

ultra-high-performance fibre-reinforced concrete; porosity; water porosity; oxygen permeability

Funding

  1. Ministerio de Economia Y Competitividad (Agencia Estatal de Investigacion) of the Spanish Government [BIA2016-78460-C3-3-R]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The experimental work studied the porous structure of Ultra-High-Performance Fibre-Reinforced Concretes (UH) with different fiber volumes and curing conditions, finding that UH concretes have a fine porous structure with significantly lower water accessibility compared to traditional and high-strength concretes.
The aim of this experimental work was to study the porous structure of Ultra-High-Performance Fibre-Reinforced Concretes (UH) made with different fibre volume contents (0%, 1%, 2%) under several curing conditions (laboratory environment, 20 degrees C, 60 degrees C, 90 degrees C), comparing the results with those recorded for ordinary, high strength and very high strength concretes. Scanning electron microscopy, mercury intrusion porosimetry, thermogravimetry, water absorption and oxygen permeability tests were carried out. The results showed a low portlandite content in UH (in the order of 75% lower than in concrete C50) and a low degree of hydration, but they rise with curing temperature. These concretes have a very fine porous structure, with a high concentration of pores on the nanoscale level, below 0.05 mu m. Their porosity accessible to water is consequently around 7-fold lower than in conventional (C30), 6-fold lower than in high-strength (C50) and 4-fold lower than in very high-strength (C90) concretes. Their oxygen permeability is at least one order of magnitude lower than in C90, two orders of magnitude lower than in C50 and three orders of magnitude lower than in C30. The percentage of added steel fibre does not affect the UH porous structure.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available