4.3 Review

Murine models of rosacea: a review

Journal

JOURNAL OF COSMETIC DERMATOLOGY
Volume 21, Issue 3, Pages 905-909

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/jocd.14164

Keywords

KLK‐ 5; LL‐ 37; murine models; rosacea

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Rosacea is characterized by facial flushing, erythema, telangiectasia, papules, and pustules, and its pathogenesis is not fully understood. The ROSacea COnsensus panel updated the diagnosis, classification, and assessment in 2017, recommending phenotype-based treatments and long-term managements. Murine models, including LL-37 injection model, have been used to study the pathophysiological and clinical features of rosacea, but there is still a need for improved and new models in future research.
Rosacea is a chronic inflammatory disease characterized by facial flushing, erythema, telangiectasia, papules, and pustules. Its pathogenesis has not been fully understood. In 2017, the global ROSacea COnsensus (ROSCO) panel updated the diagnosis, classification, and assessment of rosacea. Phenotype-based treatments and long-term managements have also been recommended. Murine models are a powerful tool in unveiling and dissecting the mechanisms of human diseases. Here, we summarized murine models of rosacea developed or used in previous research, including LL-37 intradermal injection model, KLK-5-induced inflammation model, croton oil inflammation model, 12-O-Tetradecanoylphorbol-13-acetate inflammation model, arachidonic acid inflammation model, RTX-induced vasodilation model, and UVB-induced model. LL-37 injection model has become the most intensively used model in rosacea research. Each model could show the pathophysiological and clinical features of rosacea to some extent. However, no model can show the full picture of the characteristics of rosacea. Improving existed murine models, developing new murine models, and applying them to pathogenesis and treatment research on rosacea are highly warranted in the future.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available