Journal
BMJ QUALITY & SAFETY
Volume 31, Issue 2, Pages 123-133Publisher
BMJ PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1136/bmjqs-2020-011717
Keywords
health services research; implementation science; performance measures; quality improvement; standards of care
Funding
- Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation [INV-009995]
- CDC Foundation through Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation [OPP52730]
- CDC
- World Bank-Netherlands Partnership Program Grant [P098685]
Ask authors/readers for more resources
The effectiveness of strategies to improve healthcare provider practices varies over time, with some strategies showing a decrease in effectiveness over time while others remain consistent. Programs relying solely on in-service training may need to consider periodic refresher training or combining training with group problem-solving. More high-quality research is needed to further understand the sustainability of these strategies.
Background A recent systematic review evaluated the effectiveness of strategies to improve healthcare provider (HCP) performance in low-income and middle-income countries. The review identified strategies with varying effects, including in-service training, supervision and group problem-solving. However, whether their effectiveness changed over time remained unclear. In particular, understanding whether effects decay over time is crucial to improve sustainability. Methods We conducted a secondary analysis of data from the aforementioned review to explore associations between time and effectiveness. We calculated effect sizes (defined as percentage-point (%-point) changes) for HCP practice outcomes (eg, percentage of patients correctly treated) at each follow-up time point after the strategy was implemented. We estimated the association between time and effectiveness using random-intercept linear regression models with time-specific effect sizes clustered within studies and adjusted for baseline performance. Results The primary analysis included 37 studies, and a sensitivity analysis included 77 additional studies. For training, every additional month of follow-up was associated with a 0.19 %-point decrease in effectiveness (95% CI: -0.36 to -0.03). For training combined with supervision, every additional month was associated with a 0.40 %-point decrease in effectiveness (95% CI: -0.68 to -0.12). Time trend results for supervision were inconclusive. For group problem-solving alone, time was positively associated with effectiveness, with a 0.50 %-point increase in effect per month (95% CI: 0.37 to 0.64). Group problem-solving combined with training was associated with large improvements, and its effect was not associated with time. Conclusions Time trends in the effectiveness of different strategies to improve HCP practices vary among strategies. Programmes relying solely on in-service training might need periodical refresher training or, better still, consider combining training with group problem-solving. Although more high-quality research is needed, these results, which are important for decision-makers as they choose which strategies to use, underscore the utility of studies with multiple post-implementation measurements so sustainability of the impact on HCP practices can be assessed.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available