4.8 Article

Deciphering Interfacial Chemical and Electrochemical Reactions of Sulfide-Based All-Solid-State Batteries

Journal

ADVANCED ENERGY MATERIALS
Volume 11, Issue 24, Pages -

Publisher

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/aenm.202100210

Keywords

all-solid-state lithium batteries; interfacial coating; interfacial oxygen loss; Li10GeP2S12; single-crystal LiNi0.5Mn0.3Co0.2O2

Funding

  1. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC)
  2. Canada Research Chair Program (CRC)
  3. Canada Foundation for Innovation (CFI)
  4. Ontario Research Fund
  5. China Automotive Battery Research Institute Co., Ltd.
  6. Glabat Solid-State Battery Inc.
  7. Canada Light Source at University of Saskatchewan (CLS)
  8. University of Western Ontario
  9. Mitacs Elevate Postdoctoral Fellowship
  10. Mitacs Accelerate Fellowship
  11. U.S. DOE Office of Science Facility, at Brookhaven National Laboratory [DE-SC0012704]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The interfacial resistance in sulfide electrolyte-based all-solid-state lithium batteries is a major challenge, caused by oxygen loss from oxide cathodes oxidizing the electrolyte and inducing structural changes. High operating voltages also create non-oxygen species. Coating strategies are effective in mitigating some issues but not all.
Large interfacial resistance resulting from interfacial reactions is widely acknowledged as one of the main challenges in sulfide electrolytes (SEs)-based all-solid-state lithium batteries (ASSLBs). However, the root cause of the large interfacial resistance between the SEs and typical layered oxide cathodes is not fully understood yet. Here, it is shown that interfacial oxygen loss from single-crystal LiNi0.5Mn0.3Co0.2O2 (SC-NMC532) chemically oxidizes Li10GeP2S12, generating oxygen-containing interfacial species. Meanwhile, the interfacial oxygen loss also induces a structural change of oxide cathodes (layered-to-rock salt). In addition, the high operation voltage can electrochemically oxidize SEs to form non-oxygen species (e.g., polysulfides). These chemically and electrochemically oxidized species, together with the interfacial structural change, are responsible for the large interfacial resistance at the cathode interface. More importantly, the widely adopted interfacial coating strategy is effective in suppressing chemically oxidized oxygen-containing species and mitigating the coincident interfacial structural change but is unable to prevent electrochemically induced non-oxygen species. These findings provide a deeper insight into the large interfacial resistance between the typical SE and layered oxide cathodes, which may be of assistance for the rational interface design of SE-based ASSLBs in the future.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available