3.9 Article

The bat fauna of the Kararao and Kararao Novo caves in the area under the influence of the Belo Monte hydroelectric dam, in Para, Brazil

Journal

BRAZILIAN JOURNAL OF BIOLOGY
Volume 75, Issue 3, Pages S168-S173

Publisher

INT INST ECOLOGY
DOI: 10.1590/1519-6984.00414BM

Keywords

biodiversity; caves; conservation; reservoir

Categories

Funding

  1. Norte Energia S.A.
  2. Biota Projetos e Consultoria

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Brazil's large territory displays significant richness in caves with about 12 thousand caves already recorded. Nevertheless, studies on bats in these environments are extremely scarce and fragmented. This study characterized the chiropteran fauna from two sandstone caves under the influence of the Belo Monte hydroelectric dam (Belo Monte UHE) in Para, Brazil. The Kararao and Kararao Novo caves are located on the same ridge, 250 m apart. Three expeditions were carried out in 2013 and 2014, with a 4- to 5-month interval in between. A total of 589 animals were caught, 246 in the Kararao cave and 343 in the Kararao Novo cave. Fifteen species were recorded (13 in each cave) representing 79% similarity. With the exception of Vampyrum spectrum, which is not a cave species, the remaining recorded species were mostly cave bat species. Some species seemed to use the caves seasonally, although the basis of this pattern is still unknown. The most commonly observed species were Pteronotus personatus (dominant in the Kararao cave), P. parnellii (dominant in the Kararao Novo cave), and Lionycteris spurrelli, which accounted for 65% of all captures recorded for the two caves. Natalus macrourus is a species recorded in the Kararao cave that is regionally threatened with extinction. Both caves are less than 500 m from the future reservoir; however, because the Kararao cave entry is in an area that is lower than the reservoir, it can suffer alterations that would affect its dynamics. This raises great concern about the cave's associated fauna.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.9
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available