4.8 Article

Bark-dwelling methanotrophic bacteria decrease methane emissions from trees

Journal

NATURE COMMUNICATIONS
Volume 12, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41467-021-22333-7

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Australian Research Council [LP160100061, DP210100096, DE180100535, DP180101762]
  2. National Health & Medical Research Council [APP1178715]
  3. University of Melbourne Research Grant Support Scheme
  4. Australian Research Council [LP160100061] Funding Source: Australian Research Council

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Tree bark harbors unique microbial communities dominated by methane-oxidizing bacteria (MOB) that can significantly reduce methane emissions, indicating a potentially important methane sink for further research in the field of methane mitigation.
Tree stems are an important and unconstrained source of methane, yet it is uncertain whether internal microbial controls (i.e. methanotrophy) within tree bark may reduce methane emissions. Here we demonstrate that unique microbial communities dominated by methane-oxidising bacteria (MOB) dwell within bark of Melaleuca quinquenervia, a common, invasive and globally distributed lowland species. In laboratory incubations, methane-inoculated M. quinquenervia bark mediated methane consumption (up to 96.3 mu mol m(-2) bark d(-1)) and reveal distinct isotopic delta C-13-CH4 enrichment characteristic of MOB. Molecular analysis indicates unique microbial communities reside within the bark, with MOB primarily from the genus Methylomonas comprising up to 25 % of the total microbial community. Methanotroph abundance was linearly correlated to methane uptake rates (R-2 = 0.76, p = 0.006). Finally, field-based methane oxidation inhibition experiments demonstrate that bark-dwelling MOB reduce methane emissions by 365 %. These multiple complementary lines of evidence indicate that bark-dwelling MOB represent a potentially significant methane sink, and an important frontier for further research.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available