4.8 Article

Diurnal Fe(II)/Fe(III) cycling and enhanced O2 production in a simulated Archean marine oxygen oasis

Journal

NATURE COMMUNICATIONS
Volume 12, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

NATURE RESEARCH
DOI: 10.1038/s41467-021-22258-1

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. German Research Foundation, DFG, SPP1833 [GE2558/3-1, GE2558/4-1]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study explores the toxic effects of Fe(II) on Cyanobacteria growth in a simulated ancient marine environment, and finds that gas exchange and rust formation can alleviate iron toxicity, promoting Cyanobacterial photosynthesis.
The oxygenation of early Earth's atmosphere during the Great Oxidation Event, is generally accepted to have been caused by oceanic Cyanobacterial oxygenic photosynthesis. Recent studies suggest that Fe(II) toxicity delayed the Cyanobacterial expansion necessary for the GOE. This study investigates the effects of Fe(II) on two Cyanobacteria, Pseudanabaena sp. PCC7367 and Synechococcus sp. PCC7336, in a simulated shallow-water marine Archean environment. A similar Fe(II) toxicity response was observed as reported for closed batch cultures. This toxicity was not observed in cultures provided with continuous gaseous exchange that showed significantly shorter doubling times than the closed-culture system, even with repeated nocturnal addition of Fe(II) for 12 days. The green rust (GR) formed under high Fe(II) conditions, was not found to be directly toxic to Pseudanabaena sp. PCC7367. In summary, we present evidence of diurnal Fe cycling in a simulated shallow-water marine environment for two ancestral strains of Cyanobacteria, with increased O-2 production under anoxic conditions. Cyanobacterial photosynthesis is thought to have oxygenated Earth's atmosphere during the Great Oxidation Event, but these organisms had to overcome the toxic effects of iron. Here the authors simulate Archaean conditions in Cyanobacterial cultures and find that gas exchange and rust formation alleviated iron toxicity.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available