4.8 Article

Vegetation feedback causes delayed ecosystem response to East Asian Summer Monsoon Rainfall during the Holocene

Journal

NATURE COMMUNICATIONS
Volume 12, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41467-021-22087-2

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Strategic Priority Research Program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences [XDA13010106]
  2. NSFC [41888101]
  3. MOST [2017YFA0603801]
  4. US NSF P2C2
  5. [MOST2016YFA0600504]
  6. [NSFC41630527]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study suggests that monsoonal rainfall peaked in the early Holocene while ecosystem responses peaked in the mid-Holocene over northern China. The delayed ecosystem response to rainfall is attributed to the vegetation response to winter warming and subsequent feedback with soil moisture.
One long-standing issue in the paleoclimate records is whether East Asian Summer Monsoon peaked in the early Holocene or mid-Holocene. Here, combining a set of transient earth system model simulations with proxy records, we propose that, over northern China, monsoon rainfall peaked in the early Holocene, while soil moisture and tree cover peaked in the mid-Holocene. The delayed ecosystem (soil moisture and tree cover) response to rainfall is caused by the vegetation response to winter warming and the subsequent feedback with soil moisture. Our study provides a mechanism for reconciling different evolution behaviors of monsoon proxy records; it sheds light on the driving mechanism of the monsoon evolution and monsoon-ecosystem feedback over northern China, with implications to climate changes in other high climate sensitivity regions over the globe. How the East Asian Summer Monsoon has changed over the Holocene has been debated, as some proxy records disagree with each other. Here, the authors suggest that monsoonal rainfall peaked in the early Holocene, while ecosystem responses peaked in the mid-Holocene, explaining the differences between records.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available