4.8 Article

Melanoma subpopulations that rapidly escape MAPK pathway inhibition incur DNA damage and rely on stress signalling

Journal

NATURE COMMUNICATIONS
Volume 12, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41467-021-21549-x

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NIH [1S10ODO25072, S10ODO21601]
  2. Kimmel Scholar Award [SKF16-126]
  3. Searle Scholar Award [SSP-20161533]
  4. Beckman Young Investigator Award

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Despite the increasing number of effective anti-cancer therapies, drug resistance remains a major challenge in successful cancer treatment. This study tracks the responses of single melanoma cells to BRAF inhibitors and identifies a subset of cells that quickly evade drug action through non-genetic mechanisms, leading to DNA damage.
Despite the increasing number of effective anti-cancer therapies, successful treatment is limited by the development of drug resistance. While the contribution of genetic factors to drug resistance is undeniable, little is known about how drug-sensitive cells first evade drug action to proliferate in drug. Here we track the responses of thousands of single melanoma cells to BRAF inhibitors and show that a subset of cells escapes drug via non-genetic mechanisms within the first three days of treatment. Cells that escape drug rely on ATF4 stress signalling to cycle periodically in drug, experience DNA replication defects leading to DNA damage, and yet out-proliferate other cells over extended treatment. Together, our work reveals just how rapidly melanoma cells can adapt to drug treatment, generating a mutagenesis-prone subpopulation that expands over time. BRAF inhibitors are used to treat late-stage melanoma patients harbouring BRAF mutations. Here the authors track the responses of single melanoma cells to BRAF inhibitors and show that a subset of cells rapidly escapes drug via non-genetic mechanisms and incurs DNA damage.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available