4.8 Article

Deep learning-based predictive identification of neural stem cell differentiation

Journal

NATURE COMMUNICATIONS
Volume 12, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41467-021-22758-0

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Key Research and Development Program [2016YFA0100800]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81820108013, 81922039, 81873994, 81901902, 31727801]
  3. Basic Research Project of Shanghai Science and Technology Commission, China [19JC1414700]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The differentiation of neural stem cells into neurons is crucial for potential cell-based therapeutic strategies for CNS diseases. Using deep learning, researchers have developed a reliable model for predicting NSCs fate, demonstrating high precision in identifying differentiated cell types early in culture and applicability across various inducers.
The differentiation of neural stem cells (NSCs) into neurons is proposed to be critical in devising potential cell-based therapeutic strategies for central nervous system (CNS) diseases, however, the determination and prediction of differentiation is complex and not yet clearly established, especially at the early stage. We hypothesize that deep learning could extract minutiae from large-scale datasets, and present a deep neural network model for predictable reliable identification of NSCs fate. Remarkably, using only bright field images without artificial labelling, our model is surprisingly effective at identifying the differentiated cell types, even as early as 1 day of culture. Moreover, our approach showcases superior precision and robustness in designed independent test scenarios involving various inducers, including neurotrophins, hormones, small molecule compounds and even nanoparticles, suggesting excellent generalizability and applicability. We anticipate that our accurate and robust deep learning-based platform for NSCs differentiation identification will accelerate the progress of NSCs applications.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available