4.6 Article

Applying visual mapping techniques to promote learning in community-based medical education activities

Journal

BMC MEDICAL EDUCATION
Volume 21, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/s12909-021-02646-3

Keywords

Visual mapping; Mind map; Concept map; Community-based medical education; Community medicine; teaching-learning; Rural

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study found that using visual mapping techniques as a learning tool in CBME programs significantly improved the exam scores of medical undergraduate students, helping them recall information learned more easily and aiding in structuring answers to questions, though challenges remain in identifying concepts and establishing relationships.
Background: Teaching and learning Community-Based Medical Education (CBME) requires the active engagement of students in various activities to cover planned curricular content. CBME being multifaceted involves careful application and formation of links when attending to community health problems and public health issues. Students often depend on factual recall rather than `engaging in', to counteract the broad and comprehensive nature of CBME. This study was conducted to assess the effectiveness of Visual mapping techniques as a learning tool in a CBME program for the subject Community Medicine and thereby assist medical undergraduate students in overcoming identified learning challenges. Methodology: An interventional study was conducted where medical undergraduates were randomly assigned to two different groups (each group = 30). After sensitization, a broad theme was taught to both the groups as a part of community-based teaching (CBT), each week for a month. The students in the intervention group were given the assignment to draw visual maps using the mind mapping & concept mapping techniques, after each CBT session, while the control group had Question-Answer session with built-in discussion (Conventional method) by an equally qualified, experienced faculty with no mapping assignments. A surprise written examination was conducted on the topics taught, and scores of both the groups were compared. Feedback was obtained from the intervention group. Results: Mean score of the examination by the intervention group (29.85 +/- 3.22) was significantly higher than and that of the control group (23.06 +/- 4.09) (t = 7.14 and p < 0.05). The students shared that the assignment of drawing mind and concept maps for topics taught helped in attempting questions of the written examination by facilitating easy recall of the information learned. It aided to frame the answers to descriptive questions in a structured way with the use of keywords. However, identifying the concepts and establishing relationship between them was slightly challenging.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available