4.6 Article

Development of a novel global rating scale for objective structured assessment of technical skills in an emergency medical simulation training

Journal

BMC MEDICAL EDUCATION
Volume 21, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/s12909-021-02580-4

Keywords

Global rating scale; Technical skills; Objective structured assessment; Emergency medicine; Simulation

Funding

  1. 'AG Lehrforschung' of the medical faculty of Ulm university

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study developed and validated a global rating scale for emergency medical simulation trainings, demonstrating its effectiveness in objectively assessing technical skills. In this study, novice teams scored significantly lower than expert teams, indicating the scale's ability to discriminate between different team performances.
BackgroundMedical simulation trainings lead to an improvement in patient care by increasing technical and non-technical skills, procedural confidence and medical knowledge. For structured simulation-based trainings, objective assessment tools are needed to evaluate the performance during simulation and the learning progress. In surgical education, objective structured assessment of technical skills (OSATS) are widely used and validated. However, in emergency medicine and anesthesia there is a lack of validated assessment tools for technical skills. Thus, the aim of the present study was to develop and validate a novel Global Rating Scale (GRS) for emergency medical simulation trainings.MethodsFollowing the development of the GRS, 12 teams of different experience in emergency medicine (4th year medical students, paramedics, emergency physicians) were involved in a pre-hospital emergency medicine simulation scenario and assessed by four independent raters. Subsequently, interrater reliability and construct validity of the GRS were analyzed. Moreover, the results of the GRS were cross-checked with a task specific check list. Data are presented as median (minimum; maximum).ResultsThe GRS consists of ten items each scored on a 5-point Likert scale yielding a maximum of 50 points. The median score achieved by novice teams was 22.75 points (17;30), while experts scored 39.00 points (32;47). The GRS overall scores significantly discriminated between student-guided teams and expert teams of emergency physicians (p=0.005). Interrater reliability for the GRS was high with a Kendall's coefficient of concordance W ranging from 0.64 to 0.90 in 9 of 10 items and 0.88 in the overall score.ConclusionThe GRS represents a promising novel tool to objectively assess technical skills in simulation training with high construct validity and interrater reliability in this pilot study.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available