4.7 Article

Anti-tumor activity of a novel proteasome inhibitor D395 against multiple myeloma and its lower cardiotoxicity compared with carfilzomib

Journal

CELL DEATH & DISEASE
Volume 12, Issue 5, Pages -

Publisher

SPRINGERNATURE
DOI: 10.1038/s41419-021-03701-z

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81670199, 82070223, 81720108002]
  2. National Science and Technology Major Project [2018ZX09734-007]
  3. Jiangsu Province's Medical Elite Program [ZDRCA2016015]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The novel proteasome inhibitor D395 showed high cytotoxicity to MM cells, with lower cardiotoxicity compared to carfilzomib. D395 demonstrated remarkable anti-MM activity and mild cardiotoxicity in both in vitro and in vivo experiments.
Carfilzomib, a second-generation proteasome inhibitor, has significantly improved the survival rate of multiple myeloma (MM) patients, but its clinical application is still restricted by drug resistance and cardiotoxicity. Here, we identified a novel proteasome inhibitor, D395, and assessed its efficacy in treating MM as well as its cardiotoxicity at the preclinical level. The activities of purified and intracellular proteasomes were measured to determine the effect of D395 on the proteasome. CCK-8 and flow cytometry experiments were designed to evaluate the effects of D395 on cell growth and apoptosis. The effects of D395 and carfilzomib on serum enzyme activity, echocardiography features, cardiomyocyte morphology, and hERG channels were also compared. In our study, D395 was highly cytotoxic to MM cell lines and primary MM cells but not normal cells, and it was well tolerated in vivo. Similar to carfilzomib, D395 inhibited osteoclast differentiation in a dose-dependent manner. In particular, D395 exhibited lower cardiotoxicity than carfilzomib in all experiments. In conclusion, D395 is a novel irreversible proteasome inhibitor that has remarkable anti-MM activity and mild cardiotoxicity in vitro and in vivo.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available